Sexting: Moving The Discussion From Criminality to One Of Healthy Human Sexuality, Relationships, Trust and Harm Reduction

Sexting: Moving the discussion from criminality to one of healthy human sexuality, relationships, trust and harm reduction

 

 

As both a current law enforcement officer with over 28 years of experience, and an International Social Media/Internet safety advocate, I have been watching the discussions surrounding “sexting” for the past several years. I too have waded into this discussion, with several postings on the topic that can located here:

 

 

http://thedigitalsheepdog.ca/sexting-the-who-what-where-why-and-how/

http://thedigitalsheepdog.ca/sexting-what-should-the-consequences-be/

http://thedigitalsheepdog.ca/sexting-what-should-the-consequences-be/

 

 

To date, I have now presented to over 188,000 middle and senior high school students throughout North America, several of whom have reached out to me for help (approximately 30), because of sexting gone wrong issues.

 

Recently, a study specific to teen sexting was published in the Journal of Pediatrics:

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626288/

 

This study found that “sexting is the new norm among adolescents, and isn’t reserved just for at-risk teens.” The same study also found a link between, “sexting and later sexual activity”, but it did not find that those same teens engaged in risky sexual behavior. Of interest to me, the study further went on to suggest that sexting has become the new “first base” when it comes to teen dating in today’s on-line world.

 

Specific to sexting becoming the new first base, peer reviewed research in both Canada and the United States has found that between 20-25 percent of teens have engaged in some form of sexting. Given this fact, I would disagree with the researcher’s suggestion that sexting has become the “new first base”, when 75-80 percent of our teens are not engaging in this form of online behaviour. Having said this however, 20-25 percent are, and “some”, not “all”, of these teens have experienced negative personal and public outcomes as a result. Notice I stated “some” ,not “all”, have experienced a negative outcome. In fact, research has shown that there is a relatively low risk to sexting behaviour:

 

 

http://webhost.bridgew.edu/marc/SEXTING%20AND%20COERCION%20report.pdf

 

This research is anecdotally supported by the teens that I have spoken to as well. It must be stated however, that when things do go bad, they go really bad !!! It is no wonder then that teens will tune out those who only message the negatives of sexting, without also speaking to some of the positives. As an example, one grade 12 girl shared with me that she is in a long term/long distance relationship with a young man, and that sexting allows them to stay intimate. This same young lady understood the “possible” negative consequences of such actions, BUT given the relationship and trust factor with her partner, she believed the positives of sexting outweighed the possible negatives. She stated several times that the sexting was consensual and not pressured or coercive in any way. In other words she conducted a mature risk analysis, a skill I witnessed in many of the older teens I spoke to, BUT not the younger ones.

 

As a result of this published research by the Journal of Pediatrics, I decided to post the following question to over 13,000 teens who follow me on  Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-White-Hatter/136487353183161) which can be located under the Oct 9th thread:

 

 

“A new report out of the USA found that “sexting” is developmentally normative behaviour, and in todays world of teens, can be considered a part of the dating process. In my high school days we used polaroids. I want to hear from the experts in this topic area, and the experts are you teens, do you think sexting is a part of the dating process or is it something else.”

 

The replies that I received back from the teens were nothing short of amazing. The teens were open, honest and direct when they replied to my question, and I would encourage everyone reading this article to head over to my Facebook page and have a read of what the students posted.

 

 

What have I anecdotally learned from the teens who replied to my Facebook message, as well as from thousands of students who have spoken directly to me on this subject at my presentations:

 

 

1) Sexting is “NOT” necessarily a part of the dating process or “the new first base”

 

 

2) Although not a part of the dating process, sexting can become part of sexual intimacy in a relationship once TRUST has been established, this is especially true for older teens.

 

3) Sexting in the younger ages is more about attention seeking, or has been psychologically pressured or coerced in a emerging relationship, rather than the trust/intimacy based sexting with older teens.

 

 

4) Many teens, although hearing about the bad outcomes of sexting, are unaware of the real psychological, emotional, physical and even legal consequences that such actions may have if the sexts are published outside of the relationship.

 

Traditionally, many of those in the Social Media/Internet safety advocacy field have only concentrated on the message of “abstinence”, and the undesirable personal, public and legal consequences of sexting. Specific to the abstinence message, there is lots of research out there that shows that teaching abstinence, when it comes to healthy human sexuality, does not work with teens; thus why many of us take a “harm reduction” approach and teach “safer sex” http://goo.gl/4i5qsL . I would argue that it has become clear, via peer reviewed, empirical and anecdotal research, that sexting, especially amongst our older teens, may play a role when it comes to relationships, human sexuality and intimacy given that about 20-25% of our teens have sexted. Given this fact, does it not make sense that we should also be talking about sexting (age appropriate), both the negatives and the positives, as it relates to relationships, trust and healthy human sexuality, rather than just concentrating on the negative personal, public and legal consequences? Even the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized this fact. The Supreme Court has stated that if sexting takes place between two consenting teens under the age of 18 years, then we in law enforcement are not to get involved from a criminal investigation standpoint, even though technically illegal. However , if one of the two parties distributes the sext outside of the relationship without consent, then the Supreme Court has advised that the police may want to become involved.

 

I do believe that in sexting cases where the sext has been pressured or coerced, or where a partner has distributed a sext outside of a relationship in a cruel, vindictive and criminal way, then there should be criminal consequences to their actions in most cases, in others Restorative Justice practices may be the better approach. Here’s an article that speaks directly to this type of sexting:

 

http://thedigitalsheepdog.ca/sexting-what-should-the-consequences-be/

 

 

I do believe however, that we need to change our messaging from the strict abstinence/criminal only based discussions that permeate our industry, to a more hybrid message that speaks to healthy relationships, trust, healthy human sexuality and harm reduction (emotional, psychological, physical and criminal consequences) based discussions. I believe that programs that only push the negatives do not reflect the reality of what our teens are experiencing. As Dr Elizabeth Englander, an expert on sexting and youth, has stated on this issue, “ To a student who is listening to a presentation making only negative assumptions, the adults may appear to be greatly exaggerating risks”.

 

 

As Social Media/Internet safety advocates, our role is to educate our youth with the “real” information, so that they can make an informed decision. YES, we still need to emphasize that any sext once published digitally, can become public, permanent, searchable and therefor exploitable, and provide real world examples of such. In other words teens need to know that no matter the reason for sending a sext, there is always a “risk”. In our discussions with teens however, we also need to acknowledge that research has also found that some forms of sexting can be classified as “normative” sexually developmental behaviour.

 

 

Now the question; “What age should these discussions take place ?” I believe as early as possible in an age appropriate manner. Oh, and for those who believe, “my child is in grade school so I don’t have to worry about this challenge”, I have seen sexting as early as grade 4.

 

Start the conversation !!!!

Cerebral digital food for thought

Darren

 

 

Addendum 14-11-21

I had the opportunity to discuss sexting with a group of youth advisors (mid-late teens early 20’s)  at our local Island Sexual Heath Society office today.  Many of their thoughts and insights were echoed in my original blog posting, BUT there were a couple of others that they shared as well:

  • They agreed that sexting (nudes) was not a part the “new first base” BUT maybe sexts that are “texted base only” could be. Texted based sexting wasn’t seen to be a big deal to this group.
  • All agreed that although a reality it is a rarity and not as common as many adults believe it to be.
  • Trust was also a huge factor.  In fact, a couple of these young adults shared with me that they had shared a sext (nudes) BUT before they did so, there was an intimate trust factor first. They felt there was no coercion and no pressure to do so.
  • Having said this, they also reported out that males were far more likely to just casually send out “dick picks” without asking to do so.
  • When I asked why some of them had sexted (nudes), one stated, “ I wanted to try something different in our relationship, didn’t really arouse me, so I didn’t do it again” .  Another stated that her and her partner were “…..so busy given university and my job that it was really hard to get real world face-to-face time, so sexting allowed me to stay intimate with my partner”
  • Those who did disclose that they had sexted (nudes), stated that they took active counter-measures to help protect themselves, should the picture become public; no identifying characteristics such as no face , no birthmarks, no scars, no tattoos, no background in the picture that could be tied back to them and tagging the picture’s exif data with a different name.  These were common countermeasure that I heard from many youth. Such countermeasures provide them with a believable deniability factor that it wasn’t them in the picture, but rather someone else.  It would appear that some youth have learned to adapt, overcome and improvise to help minimize risks, given some of the well publicized negative consequences of sexting gone public.
  • Of interest, all stated that guys usually only want a “face and boob shot”, rather than a full nude, which would include the groin or anal areas. When I asked why, they couldn’t answer.
  • Several stated that they weren’t afraid of their partner sending out the nudes, but rather they were more concerned about third parties who would access there unlocked phone, or their partner’s phone, who could then potentially access and see the pictures. In fact , one of the youth spoke up and stated that is exactly what happened to her.  A friend had asked to use her phone, and in the process located her nudes and was attempting to email them to his phone, but she was able to stop him before this happened.
  • All agreed that when males send and receive sexts they are considered studs by their friends and peers, but when female do it they are often labelled sluts.
  • All agreed that school relationship/sex education needs to be updated to reflect the reality of sexting (both texts and nudes) in the context of healthy human sexuality, relationships and consent